Re: MSO code flow to OpenStack for Orchestration


NOSHPITZ, CLAUDE <cn5542@...>
 

Apologies if I am misreading this -- it seems like interposing at least some layer of mediation in front of "raw" OpenStack calls is a pretty clear requirement for R1.

If that's already covered in MultiVIM, then would the question be more about minimizing technical debt due to non-future-proof workflows or other tooling?

--Claude

On Jun 27, 2017, at 3:55 PM, DeWayne Filppi <dewayne@gigaspaces.com> wrote:

I'd say the ideal would be for the MSO/SO to not directly call VIM APIs, but would not want to jeopardize the SO project based on an external dependency that frankly isn't necessary to reach the use case goal for R1. Just my 2 cents.
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6eVY7dvBpvoXBXPsAVK6PXwHbCRePAEMgPW2uE02KE0&m=mWC-oG4n2nIZJktAFstJfXIaG0sVFVTWo1T0Q28DNGI&s=aoDDwjKjF9eufW3gTP5RSs3FjvtDQorm0wm2gMx8n2o&e=

Join onap-discuss@lists.onap.org to automatically receive all group messages.