|
[OOM][AAF] aaf helm release configMap too large
I've seen these, Jack. Check out this ticket for additional info: https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-2534 Jorge
I've seen these, Jack. Check out this ticket for additional info: https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-2534 Jorge
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #21954
·
|
|
[oom] deployment failures Frankfurt/latest
Hi Andrew, I see the same problem as I am incorporating the certInitializer into policy. The system installs fine but the individual components are unregistered (still see dmaap, portal, etc .. resour
Hi Andrew, I see the same problem as I am incorporating the certInitializer into policy. The system installs fine but the individual components are unregistered (still see dmaap, portal, etc .. resour
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #21867
·
|
|
ODP: [POLICY][CLAMP] Error when submitting to Policy Engine
#clamp
#policy
Hi Lukasz, The policy api component has a limitation in this release where requires you to start fresh with a database if you perform an upgrade, which seems may be the case in your situation as I'm g
Hi Lukasz, The policy api component has a limitation in this release where requires you to start fresh with a database if you perform an upgrade, which seems may be the case in your situation as I'm g
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #21267
·
|
|
[Frankfurt] vLB CDS bootstrap and Plicy naming modeling error
These are the latest Frankfurt images for policy, Yuriy: onap/policy-api:2.2.4 onap/policy-pap:2.2.3 onap/policy-pe:1.6.4 onap/policy-pdpd-cl:1.6.4 onap/policy-apex-pdp:2.3.2 onap/policy-xacml-pdp:2.2
These are the latest Frankfurt images for policy, Yuriy: onap/policy-api:2.2.4 onap/policy-pap:2.2.3 onap/policy-pe:1.6.4 onap/policy-pdpd-cl:1.6.4 onap/policy-apex-pdp:2.3.2 onap/policy-xacml-pdp:2.2
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #21234
·
|
|
[POLICY] Credentials to access policy
Hello Krzysztof, Some teams are migrating from legacy components (that will eventually will be deprecated) to non-legacy ones. Configuration is defined here ( see Values.restserver.user + .Values.rest
Hello Krzysztof, Some teams are migrating from legacy components (that will eventually will be deprecated) to non-legacy ones. Configuration is defined here ( see Values.restserver.user + .Values.rest
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #20997
·
|
|
[POLICY] DBDao username and password
I added a patch on top of your review, Kryzysztof, if you can take a look. It's passing healthchecks now in my side. I'll keep an eye on for the oom deploy job results, hopefully it will pass the heal
I added a patch on top of your review, Kryzysztof, if you can take a look. It's passing healthchecks now in my side. I'll keep an eye on for the oom deploy job results, hopefully it will pass the heal
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #20615
·
|
|
[POLICY] DBDao username and password
Hi Krysztof, Is this the patch that you are testing? https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/104915 If it is, I can install, give it a try and work with local folks as needed. Let me know. Jorge
Hi Krysztof, Is this the patch that you are testing? https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/104915 If it is, I can install, give it a try and work with local folks as needed. Let me know. Jorge
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #20612
·
|
|
Control loop policy error
Hello Sivakumar, The trigger_policy should point to an entry in the policies array: vIMSPolicy1 controlLoop: abatement: false controlLoopName: LOOP_Closed_Loop_vIMS_v3_0_VIMS_SPROUT0_analytics_ms time
Hello Sivakumar, The trigger_policy should point to an entry in the policies array: vIMSPolicy1 controlLoop: abatement: false controlLoopName: LOOP_Closed_Loop_vIMS_v3_0_VIMS_SPROUT0_analytics_ms time
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #20502
·
|
|
Control loop policy error
Hello Siva, It seems a malformed policy. I take it that this is El Alto or Dublin. From policy standpoint you could dump policies by doing a "kubectl exec -it " into drools container and dumping the p
Hello Siva, It seems a malformed policy. I take it that this is El Alto or Dublin. From policy standpoint you could dump policies by doing a "kubectl exec -it " into drools container and dumping the p
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #20447
·
|
|
Policy Offered Api Test:unable to get local issuer certificate,how to solve it?
#policy
#elalto
Hello, you'll need one of these 2 solutions: a) make newton client trust the aaf ca root certificate from which policy derives their certificates (same as other components), this would be configuratio
Hello, you'll need one of these 2 solutions: a) make newton client trust the aaf ca root certificate from which policy derives their certificates (same as other components), this would be configuratio
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #20287
·
|
|
[CLAMP] [onap-discuss] El Alto - CLAMP UI getting The policies defined have NOT yet been created on the policy engine
Hello Deepak, Based on your log message, it looks like you may be hitting the issue reported in the POLICY-1939 ticket in El Alto. The workaround would be to bounce the pod that the message is complai
Hello Deepak, Based on your log message, it looks like you may be hitting the issue reported in the POLICY-1939 ticket in El Alto. The workaround would be to bounce the pod that the message is complai
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #20093
·
|
|
#policy Policy created by CLAMP not found
#policy
Hello Aniello, The Policy GUI is part of the legacy architecture which will eventually be deprecated and it is not coupled with the CLAMP GUI (new architecture). You can look at policies through CLAMP
Hello Aniello, The Policy GUI is part of the legacy architecture which will eventually be deprecated and it is not coupled with the CLAMP GUI (new architecture). You can look at policies through CLAMP
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #19352
·
|
|
Policy push to default PDP groups
#policy
#drools
Hi Min, Yes, in the message, the "name":"default", should be "name":"amsterdam" to match the drools controller name. If you look in the actual "createPolicy" messages using the legacy APIs, https://gi
Hi Min, Yes, in the message, the "name":"default", should be "name":"amsterdam" to match the drools controller name. If you look in the actual "createPolicy" messages using the legacy APIs, https://gi
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #19139
·
|
|
Policy push to default PDP groups
#policy
#drools
Check out in the drools container the $POLICY_LOGS/network.log , look for configuration messages over the PDPD-CONFIGURATION channel, you should see an update configuration request commanding drools t
Check out in the drools container the $POLICY_LOGS/network.log , look for configuration messages over the PDPD-CONFIGURATION channel, you should see an update configuration request commanding drools t
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #19122
·
|
|
#clamp #drools #controlloop #dublin CLAMP Submit generate error in drools
#drools
#controlloop
#dublin
#clamp
Hello, Please monitor this ticket for resolution to this problem: https://jira.onap.org/browse/CLAMP-484. It's related to the payload field being a (empty) string. Best regards, Jorge
Hello, Please monitor this ticket for resolution to this problem: https://jira.onap.org/browse/CLAMP-484. It's related to the payload field being a (empty) string. Best regards, Jorge
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #18724
·
|
|
Policy Drool Dmaap Pooling
#drools
#policy
#dmaap
Hello, Try changing "ueb" to dmaap, for example: http --verify=no -a "${TELEMETRY_USER}:${TELEMETRY_PASSWORD}" PUT https://localhost:9696/policy/pdp/engine/topics/sources/dmaap/DCAE_TOPIC/events @./dc
Hello, Try changing "ueb" to dmaap, for example: http --verify=no -a "${TELEMETRY_USER}:${TELEMETRY_PASSWORD}" PUT https://localhost:9696/policy/pdp/engine/topics/sources/dmaap/DCAE_TOPIC/events @./dc
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #18605
·
|
|
Drools can't be activated after pushing policies from PAP to PDP-D.
#policy
#controlloop
Hello Charlton, Some additional feedback besides Sandeep. I installed Casablanca release, and don't see the errors you've shown in the drools logs when deploying policies, not sure if in your case it
Hello Charlton, Some additional feedback besides Sandeep. I installed Casablanca release, and don't see the errors you've shown in the drools logs when deploying policies, not sure if in your case it
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #18524
·
|
|
[Controlloop][CLAMP][Policy] - Policy Deployment status is 400 Bad request
Hi Vidya, There’s POLICY-1810 that covers the error you pointed out in El Alto. Having said that, I believe that for your purposes, the error is mostly cosmetic, as you see the operational policy bein
Hi Vidya, There’s POLICY-1810 that covers the error you pointed out in El Alto. Having said that, I believe that for your purposes, the error is mostly cosmetic, as you see the operational policy bein
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #18303
·
|
|
[Dublin-vFW] is really Dublin policy framework already adapted to work offline ?
Right with the new architecture, the work will be done with the “usecases” controller .. there are 2 architectures, a) legacy (amsterdam), b) “new” (usecases) that are supported. May be a bit confusin
Right with the new architecture, the work will be done with the “usecases” controller .. there are 2 architectures, a) legacy (amsterdam), b) “new” (usecases) that are supported. May be a bit confusin
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #17702
·
|
|
[Dublin-vFW] is really Dublin policy framework already adapted to work offline ?
Hello Michal, The usecases controller is cooked in the image, it should be there with no further action. Please check with these 2 commands in the container: $ telemetry get controllers Jorge
Hello Michal, The usecases controller is cooked in the image, it should be there with no further action. Please check with these 2 commands in the container: $ telemetry get controllers Jorge
|
By
Jorge Hernandez
· #17696
·
|