Re: Jira Cleanup

Pierre Close

Hello Amy,


My personal opinion:


  • 54, 56, 62, 86, 90 are probably worth investigating further, especially 56, 62 and 90 to formalize what is/might be existing.
  • I have the feeling that 89 is a combination of 56 and 62, but I might be wrong.


As for the others:


  • 6: as discussed, possibly a huge work that would be trying to catch up endlessly
  • 18: covered by the xNF requirements that were defined?
  • 26: related to security scans we discussed recently? I mean, would this SECCOM-26 help for security scans requirement?
  • 40: honestly, nothing I can remember of


Comments are welcome


Best regards,



From: onap-seccom@... <onap-seccom@...> On Behalf Of ZWARICO, AMY
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 9:23 PM
To: onap-seccom@...
Subject: [Onap-seccom] Jira Cleanup


***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference for more information.

We are cleaning up the SECCOM Jira. Please review the following tickets which have no owners and indicate whether you think that SECCOM should identify an owner to work on the ticket (+1) or close the ticket as something that SECCOM should not pursue (-1).



​​​​​Amy Zwarico, LMTS

Chief Security Office / Emerging Services Security

AT&T Services

(205) 613-1667


"This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of AT&T,  and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your electronic device. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited."


Join to automatically receive all group messages.