Guilin RC0 Status: Use Cases and Functional Requirements
Good evening TSC (and proxies),
I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status
We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320) We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22nd, 2020)
Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria? +1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21st, 2020 end of your day.
Many thanks and regards Catherine
NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.
|
||
|
||
Jason Hunt
+1
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Regards, Jason Hunt Distinguished Engineer, IBM Phone: 314-749-7422 Email: djhunt@... Twitter: @DJHunt
On Oct 19, 2020, at 6:17 PM, Catherine LEFEVRE <catherine.lefevre@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Srini
+1
From: onap-tsc-vote@... <onap-tsc-vote@...>
On Behalf Of Catherine LEFEVRE
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 4:17 PM To: onap-tsc-vote@... Subject: [onap-tsc-vote] Guilin RC0 Status: Use Cases and Functional Requirements Importance: High
Good evening TSC (and proxies),
I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status
We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320) We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22nd, 2020)
Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria? +1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21st, 2020 end of your day.
Many thanks and regards Catherine
NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.
|
||
|
||
+1
Ranny.
From: <onap-tsc-vote@...> on behalf of Catherine LEFEVRE <catherine.lefevre@...>
Good evening TSC (and proxies),
I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status
We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320) We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22nd, 2020)
Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria? +1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21st, 2020 end of your day.
Many thanks and regards Catherine
NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.
|
||
|
||
Olivier Phenix
+1
Regards, -- Olivier Phénix, ing. / P. Eng Senior Manager, Orchestration Platform T: 514-870-3776 M: 438-341-9422
From: <onap-tsc-vote@...> on behalf of Catherine LEFEVRE <catherine.lefevre@...>
Good evening TSC (and proxies),
I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status
We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320) We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22nd, 2020)
Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria? +1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21st, 2020 end of your day.
Many thanks and regards Catherine
NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.
External Email: Please use caution when opening links and attachments / Courriel externe: Soyez prudent avec les liens et documents joints
|
||
|
||
Alla Goldner
+1
Sent from Nine
From: Catherine LEFEVRE <catherine.lefevre@...>
Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2020 02:18 To: onap-tsc-vote@... Subject: [onap-tsc-vote] Guilin RC0 Status: Use Cases and Functional Requirements Good evening TSC (and proxies),
I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status
We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320) We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22nd, 2020)
Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria? +1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21st, 2020 end of your day.
Many thanks and regards Catherine
NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.
This email and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs Email Terms of Service, which you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-terms-of-service
|
||
|
||
Yang Bin
+1
From: onap-tsc-vote@... <onap-tsc-vote@...>
On Behalf Of Catherine LEFEVRE
Sent: 2020年10月20日 7:17 To: onap-tsc-vote@... Subject: [onap-tsc-vote] Guilin RC0 Status: Use Cases and Functional Requirements Importance: High
Good evening TSC (and proxies),
I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status
We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320) We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22nd, 2020)
Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria? +1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21st, 2020 end of your day.
Many thanks and regards Catherine
NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.
|
||
|
||
Dong Wang
+1 Regards, Dong
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人:Catherine LEFEVRE "catherine.lefevre@..." 时 间:2020/10/20 07:17:06 星期二 收件人:"onap-tsc-vote@..." "onap-tsc-vote@..." 抄送人: 主 题:[onap-tsc-vote] Guilin RC0 Status: Use Cases and Functional Requirements Good evening TSC (and proxies),
I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status
We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320) We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22nd, 2020)
Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria? +1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21st, 2020 end of your day.
Many thanks and regards Catherine
NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.
|
||
|
||
seshu kumar m
+1 -------------------------------------------------- From:Catherine LEFEVRE <catherine.lefevre@...>
To:onap-tsc-vote <onap-tsc-vote@...>
Date:2020-10-20 04:47:37
Subject:[onap-tsc-vote] Guilin RC0 Status: Use Cases and Functional Requirements
Good evening TSC (and proxies),
I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status
We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320) We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22nd, 2020)
Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria? +1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21st, 2020 end of your day.
Many thanks and regards Catherine
NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.
|
||
|
||
+1
cheers Timo
From: onap-tsc-vote@... <onap-tsc-vote@...>
On Behalf Of Catherine LEFEVRE via lists.onap.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 2:17 AM To: onap-tsc-vote@... Subject: [onap-tsc-vote] Guilin RC0 Status: Use Cases and Functional Requirements Importance: High
Good evening TSC (and proxies),
I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status
We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320) We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22nd, 2020)
Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria? +1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21st, 2020 end of your day.
Many thanks and regards Catherine
NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.
|
||
|
||
Ciaran Johnston
+1
Regards,
Ciaran
From: onap-tsc-vote@... <onap-tsc-vote@...>
On Behalf Of Catherine LEFEVRE via lists.onap.org
Sent: Tuesday 20 October 2020 00:17 To: onap-tsc-vote@... Subject: [onap-tsc-vote] Guilin RC0 Status: Use Cases and Functional Requirements Importance: High
Good evening TSC (and proxies),
I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status
We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320) We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22nd, 2020)
Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements (REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria? +1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21st, 2020 end of your day.
Many thanks and regards Catherine
NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.
|
||
|
||
+1
|
||
|