On Oct 19, 2020, at 6:17 PM, Catherine LEFEVRE <catherine.lefevre@...> wrote:



Good evening TSC (and proxies),

 

I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements

We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements

(REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341)

have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status

 

We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320)

We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22^nd, 2020)

 

Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements

(REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria?

+1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21^st, 2020 end of your day.

 

Many thanks and regards

Catherine

 

Catherine Lefèvre AVP Software Development & Engineering AT&T Labs – Network Systems Common Platform & Services ONAP TSC Chair   <image001.png>         <image003.png>   Phone: +32 2 418 49 22 Mobile: +32 475 77 36 73 catherine.lefevre@...   TEXTING and DRIVING… It Can Wait

AT&T BUROGEST OFFICE PARK SA Avenue des Dessus-de-Lives, 2 5101 Loyers (Namur) Belgium

 

NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.

 

Good evening TSC (and proxies),

I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements

We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements

(REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341)

have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status

We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320)

We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22^nd, 2020)

Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements

(REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria?

+1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21^st, 2020 end of your day.

Many thanks and regards

Catherine

NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.

This email and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs Email Terms of Service, which you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-terms-of-service

Good evening TSC (and proxies),

I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements

We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements

(REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341)

have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status

We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320)

We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22^nd, 2020)

Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements

(REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria?

+1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21^st, 2020 end of your day.

Many thanks and regards

Catherine

NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.

Good evening TSC (and proxies),

I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements

We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements

(REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341)

have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status

We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320)

We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22^nd, 2020)

Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements

(REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria?

+1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21^st, 2020 end of your day.

Many thanks and regards

Catherine

NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.

Good evening TSC (and proxies),

I want to follow-up with you regarding Guilin RC0 for Use Cases and Functional Requirements

We confirm that all the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements

(REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341)

have now scorecard (Green/Yellow), an associated Test Plan and an update to the Integration Testing status

We are still missing some inputs about the following functional requirements (REQ-381, REQ-353, REQ-335-339, REQ-332, REQ-320)

We will follow up with them then we will need to draw conclusions during our next TSC Call (Oct 22^nd, 2020)

Can I ask you to vote if you agree to approve the use cases (REQ-347, REQ-345, REQ-342, REQ-325) and the following functional requirements

(REQ-334, REQ318, REQ-319, REQ-321, REQ-322, REQ-327, REQ-352, REQ-324, REQ-331 and REQ-341) that they have met RC0 Criteria?

+1 if you agree; 0 – no opinion and -1-you disagree no later than October 21^st, 2020 end of your day.

Many thanks and regards

Catherine

NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above.